COMPETITIVENESS OF A CONSTRUCTION ENTERPRISE TAKING INTO ACCOUNT INTANGIBLE FACTORS

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32782/2786-8273/2025-10-23

Keywords:

construction, competitiveness, factors, enterprise, efficiency

Abstract

The article is devoted to the issues of determining the factors that affect the level of competitiveness of a construction enterprise, in particular, intangible factors are singled out, which are the competitive advantage of construction enterprises themselves. It is substantiated that a sustainable competitive advantage is achieved only thanks to assets and competencies that cannot be copied or accurately reproduced. Therefore, considering the features and advantages of intangible assets of a construction enterprise in the context of competitiveness, it is proven that, unlike tangible assets, intangible assets are more difficult to accumulate and transfer, since they are unique to the companies that own them. It is determined that, unlike tangible assets, which have specific limited capacities and technical characteristics, intangible assets have more "soft" restrictions, that is, the same assets can be used in the development of a number of products or in promoting goods on the market. The article determines that an important characteristic of intangible assets is their scalability, which is limited, in essence, only by the capacity of the market. An additional competitive advantage of intangible assets is the benefits obtained through the network effect, which is that the value of the asset of the end consumer increases with the increase in the number of people using it. In this case, the positive impact of the network effect, on the one hand, increases the benefits of all end consumers of the product (i.e., those who already use this asset), on the other hand, contributes to the attraction of new users (those who still use the asset), which ultimately leads to an increase in the benefits of the company itself. The article proves that the intangible factors of the competitiveness of construction enterprises are sources of potential benefits devoid of physical or financial form, characterized by significant information potential. In addition, in conditions of increased competition, globalization and digitalization, the intangible factors of the competitiveness of construction enterprises can serve as a significant competitive advantage due to their uniqueness, the difficulty of accumulating, transferring and reproducing them, the absence of strict restrictions on the scope and volume of their use.

References

Dmytrenko V. I. Modern conditions for managing the competitiveness of construction enterprises. Effective economy. 2017. No. 4. URL: http://www.economy.nayka.com.ua/?op=1&z=8141

Dmytriev I. A., Kyrchata I. M., Shershenyuk O. M. Enterprise competitiveness: textbook. Kharkiv, 2020. 340 p.

Enterprise competitiveness: assessment of the level and directions for improvement: [monograph / edited by O.G. Yankov]. Odesa: Atlant, 2013. 470 p.

Lupak R. L., Vasyltsiv T. G. Enterprise competitiveness: textbook. Lviv: LKA Publishing House, 2016. 484 p.

Kotlyk A. V. Categorical apparatus and system properties of the competitiveness of the enterprise. Formation of a market economy: collection of scientific works: Special issue "Economics of the enterprise: theory and practice". Part 1. Kyiv: KNEU, 2008. Pp. 314–320.

Kuzmin O.E. Competitiveness of the enterprise: planning and diagnostics: / Monograph / O.E. Kuzmin, O.G. Melnyk, O.P. Romanko; under the general editorship of Doctor of Economics, Professor Kuzmin O.E. Ivano-Frankivsk: IFNTUNG, 2017. 180 p.

Lipich L. G., Chornukha I. V., Tsymbalyuk I. O. Formation of a development strategy for a construction enterprise in the context of investment competition [Text]: monograph. Lutsk: Vezha-Druk, 2015. 212 p.

Novykova I. V. Management of the competitiveness of construction enterprises in the context of technological change. Kyiv-Kherson: Kyiv. University of Construction and Architecture; Publishing House PP Vyshemirskyi V.S., 2015. 360 p.

Aaker David A., Managing Assets and Skills: The Key to a Sustainable Competitive Advantage, California Management Review, Winter, 1989, pp. 91-106.

Brondoni Silvio M., Brand Policy and Brand Equity. Symphonya. Emerging Issues in Management. 2000/2001. № 1. P. 5-25.

Chatterjee Savan, Wernerfelt Birger, The Link Between Resources and Type of Diversification: Theory and Evidence. Strategic Management Journal. 1991. Vol. 12, n. 1. Pp. 761-771.

George A. Akerlof. The Market for "Lemons": Quality Uncertainty and the Market Mechanism. The Quarterly Journal of Economics. 1970 V.84, Issue 3, August. P. 488-500.

Zingales Luigi, In Search of New Foundations. Journal of Finance. 2000. Vol. 55, n. 4. Pp. 1623-1653.

Lev, B. Intangibles: Management, Measurement and Reporting / The Brookings Institute Press, Washington, 2001. 240 p.

Perrini F., Vurro C. Corporate Sustainability, Intangible Assets Accumulation and Competitive Advantage. Symphonya Emerging Issues in Management. 2010. № 2.

Stewart, T.A. Intellectual Capital: The New Wealth of Organisations. New York: Crown Business, 1998. P. 67.

Downloads

Published

2025-09-26

How to Cite

Leshchynsky, V. (2025). COMPETITIVENESS OF A CONSTRUCTION ENTERPRISE TAKING INTO ACCOUNT INTANGIBLE FACTORS. Український економічний часопис, (10), 148–152. https://doi.org/10.32782/2786-8273/2025-10-23