THE EVOLUTION OF THE UNIVERSITY PHENOMENON IN THE DISCOURSE OF METAMODERNISM

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32782/2786-8273/2025-9-5

Keywords:

«triple helix» concept, evolutionary development, scientific progress, innovations, entrepreneurial university, metamodernism, diversification of funding, volatile environment

Abstract

Introduction. The university’s role in shaping intellectual, scientific, and cultural landscapes has evolved due to socio-economic development. Contemporary transformations challenge traditional higher education paradigms, necessitating a re-conceptualization beyond autonomous knowledge production. Purpose. This article investigates the evolution of the university phenomenon within metamodern discourse, tracing the transformation of its functions from classical educational to research-oriented and entrepreneurial models, interpreting these changes as responses to social, economic, and cultural challenges. Methods. The research employs historical and theoretical analysis, a critical review of literature on university development (focusing on entrepreneurial university and metamodernism), and comparative analysis of classical, research, and entrepreneurial models. The metamodern framework serves as an analytical lens for broader socio-cultural interpretation. Results. The study reveals a clear evolutionary trajectory driven by societal shifts and the increasing importance of knowledge and innovation. The entrepreneurial university is characterized by knowledge commercialization, innovation fostering, and engagement with industry and society, demanding flexibility and a proactive approach. Metamodernism provides a framework for understanding the complex dynamics, highlighting the tension between tradition and innovation, local and global perspectives, academic freedom and and pragmatism. Conclusion. The entrepreneurial university, embodying the metamodern era, merges academic excellence with economic development and social responsibility. While offering opportunities for innovation and progress, it presents challenges regarding commercialization and ethical standards. Universities must navigate these tensions by embracing a metamodern approach valuing tradition and innovation, fostering collaboration, and prioritizing social impact alongside economic gains.

References

Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions on a Renewed EU agenda for higher education. URL: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/ALL/?uri=CELEX:52017DC0247

Communication from the Commission on a European strategy for universities. URL: https://education.ec.europa.eu/sites/default/files/2022-01/communication-european-strategy-for-universities-graphic-version.pdf

Reimagining our futures together: a new social contract for education. UNESDOC Digital Library. URL: https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000379707.locale=en

Про схвалення Стратегії розвитку вищої освіти в Україні на 2022-2032 роки : розпорядження Кабінету Міністрів України від 23 лютого 2022 р. № 286-р. URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/286-2022-р#Text

Etzkowitz H., Leydesdorff L. The dynamics of innovation: from National Systems and «Mode 2» to a Triple Helix of university-industry-government relations». Research Policy. 2000. Vol. 29(2). P. 109–123. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00055-4

Rådberg K., Löfsten H. The entrepreneurial university and development of large-scale research infrastructure: exploring the emerging university function of collaboration and leadership. The Journal of Technology Transfer. 2024. Vol. 49(1). P. 334–366. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-023-10033-x

Audretsch D., Keilbach M. Entrepreneurship Capital and Economic Performance. Regional Studies. 2004. Vol. 38(8). P. 949–959. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0034340042000280956

Urbano D., Guerrero M. Entrepreneurial Universities: Socioeconomic Impacts of Academic Entrepreneurship in a European Region. Economic Development Quarterly. 2013. Vol. 27(1). P. 40–55. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0891242412471973

Abreu M., Grinevich V. The entrepreneurial university: strategies, processes, and competing goals. The Journal of Technology Transfer. 2024. Vol. 49. P. 1991–2034. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-024-10085-7

Clark B.R. Creating Entrepreneurial Universities: Organizational Pathways of Transformation : IUA Press & Pergamon, Paris, 1998.

Starostina A., Bugrov V., Kravchenko V., Gatto G., Kochkina N. Entrepreneurial university: exploring its essence, phases of development, and operating mechanism during wartime in Ukraine. International Journal of Educational Development. 2023. 102895. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2023.102895

Sánchez-Barrioluengo M., Benneworth P. Is the entrepreneurial university also regionally engaged? Analysing the influence of university’s structural configuration on third mission performance. Technological Forecasting and Social Change. 2019. Vol. 141. P. 206–218. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2018.10.017

Vorley T., Nelles J. Building Entrepreneurial Architectures: A Conceptual Interpretation of the Third Mission. Policy Futures in Education. 2009. Vol. 7(3). P. 284–296. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2304/pfie.2009.7.3.284

D’Este P., Patel P. University-Industry Linkages in the UK: What Are the Factors Underlying the Variety of Interactions with Industry? Research Policy. 2007. Vol. 36. P. 1295–1313. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2007.05.002

Курбатов С. В. Феномен університету в контексті часових та просторових викликів : монографія. Суми : Університетська книга, 2014. 262 с.

Ситницький М. В. Стратегічне управління розвитком дослідницьких університетів України: теорія і практика : дис. … д-ра. економ. наук : 08.00.03. Київ, 2019. 577 с.

Andersen L. R. Polymodern Economics. Metamodern Theory and Praxis. 2024. Vol. 1(1). P. 63–86. DOI: https://doi.org/10.70613/2024.0004

Lynn M.A. Intentional unlearning practices in postmassified university systems: Reformation for the metamodern era. Journal of Global Education and Research. 2024. Vol. 8(3). P. 222–235. DOI: https://www.doi.org/10.5038/2577-509X.8.3.1334

Bowman S., Salter J., Stephenson C., Humble D. Metamodern sensibilities: toward a pedagogical framework for a wicked world. Teaching in Higher Education. 2022. Vol. 29(5). P. 1361–1380. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2022.2151835

Grant E. A History of the University in Europe. Volume 1: Universities in the Middle Ages by Hilde de Ridder-Symoens. Review. History of Education Quarterly. 1993. Vol. 33. P. 395–398.

How universities helped transform the medieval world. URL: https://cepr.org/voxeu/columns/how-universities-helped-transform-medieval-world

Bongaerts J.C. The Humboldtian Model of Higher Education and its Significance for the European University on Responsible Consumption and Production. BHM Berg- und Huttenmannische Monatshefte. 2022. Vol. 167. P. 500–507. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00501-022-01280-w

Rüegg W. A History of the University in Europe. Vol. IV: Universities Since 1945. Cambridge University Press, 2011.

Vermeulen T., van den Akker R. Utopia, Sort of: A Case Study in Metamodernism. Studia Neophilologica. 2015. Vol. 87:sup1. P. 5–67, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00393274.2014.981964

Freinacht H. The Listening Society. A Metamodern Guide to Politics. Book One. Metamoderna ApS, 2017.

Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions on a Renewed EU agenda for higher education. URL: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/ALL/?uri=CELEX:52017DC0247

Communication from the Commission on a European strategy for universities. URL: https://education.ec.europa.eu/sites/default/files/2022-01/communication-european-strategy-for-universities-graphic-version.pdf

Reimagining our futures together: a new social contract for education. UNESDOC Digital Library. URL: https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000379707.locale=en

Pro skhvalennia Stratehii rozvytku vyshchoi osvity v Ukraini na 2022-2032 roky : rozporiadzhennia Kabinetu Ministriv Ukrainy vid 23 liutoho 2022 r. No. 286-r [On Approval of the Strategy for the Development of Higher Education in Ukraine for 2022-2032 : Order of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine dated February 23, 2022, No. 286-r]. Available at: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/286-2022-р#Text

Etzkowitz, H., Leydesdorff, L. (2000). The dynamics of innovation: from National Systems and «Mode 2» to a Triple Helix of university-industry-government relations». Research Policy, vol. 29(2), p. 109–123. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00055-4

Rådberg, K., Löfsten, H. (2024). The entrepreneurial university and development of large-scale research infrastructure: exploring the emerging university function of collaboration and leadership. The Journal of Technology Transfer, vol. 49(1), p. 334–366. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-023-10033-x

Audretsch, D., Keilbach, M. (2004). Entrepreneurship Capital and Economic Performance. Regional Studies, vol. 38(8), p. 949–959. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0034340042000280956

Urbano, D., Guerrero, M. (2013). Entrepreneurial Universities: Socioeconomic Impacts of Academic Entrepreneurship in a European Region. Economic Development Quarterly, vol. 27(1), p. 40–55. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0891242412471973

Abreu, M., Grinevich, V. (2024). The entrepreneurial university: strategies, processes, and competing goals. The Journal of Technology Transfer, vol. 49, p. 1991–2034. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-024-10085-7

Clark, B.R. (1998). Creating Entrepreneurial Universities: Organizational Pathways of Transformation. IUA Press & Pergamon, Paris.

Starostina, A., Bugrov, V., Kravchenko, V., Gatto, G., Kochkina, N. (2023). Entrepreneurial university: exploring its essence, phases of development, and operating mechanism during wartime in Ukraine. International Journal of Educational Development, 102895. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2023.102895

Sánchez-Barrioluengo, M., Benneworth, P. (2019). Is the entrepreneurial university also regionally engaged? Analysing the influence of university’s structural configuration on third mission performance. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, vol. 141, p. 206–218. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2018.10.017

Vorley, T., Nelles, J. (2009). Building Entrepreneurial Architectures: A Conceptual Interpretation of the Third Mission. Policy Futures in Education, vol. 7(3), p. 284–296. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2304/pfie.2009.7.3.284

D’Este, P., Patel, P. (2007). University-Industry Linkages in the UK: What Are the Factors Underlying the Variety of Interactions with Industry? Research Policy, vol. 36, p. 1295–1313. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2007.05.002

Kurbatov, S. (2014). Fenomen universytetu v konteksti chasovykh ta prostorovykh vyklykiv : monohrafiia [The phenomenon of the university in the context of temporal and spatial challenges : monograph]. Sumy : Universytetska knyha – Sumy : University Book, 2014. 262 p.

Sytnytskyi, M. (2019). Stratehichne upravlinnia rozvytkom doslidnytskykh universytetiv Ukrainy: teoriia i praktyka : dys. … d-ra. ekonom. nauk : 08.00.03 [Strategic management of the development of research universities in Ukraine: theory and practice : diss. ... Dr. of Econ. Sciences]. Kyiv, 2019. 577 p.

Andersen, L. R. (2024). Polymodern Economics. Metamodern Theory and Praxis, vol. 1(1), p. 63–86. DOI: https://doi.org/10.70613/2024.0004

Lynn, M.A. (2024). Intentional unlearning practices in postmassified university systems: Reformation for the metamodern era. Journal of Global Education and Research, vol. 8(3), p. 222–235. DOI: https://www.doi.org/10.5038/2577-509X.8.3.1334

Bowman, S., Salter, J., Stephenson, C., Humble, D. (2022). Metamodern sensibilities: toward a pedagogical framework for a wicked world. Teaching in Higher Education, vol. 29(5), p. 1361–1380. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2022.2151835

Grant, E. (1993). A History of the University in Europe. Volume 1: Universities in the Middle Ages by Hilde de Ridder-Symoens. Review. History of Education Quarterly, vol. 33, p. 395–398.

How universities helped transform the medieval world. URL: https://cepr.org/voxeu/columns/how-universities-helped-transform-medieval-world

Bongaerts, J.C. (2022). The Humboldtian Model of Higher Education and its Significance for the European University on Responsible Consumption and Production. BHM Berg- und Huttenmannische Monatshefte, vol. 167, p. 500–507. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00501-022-01280-w

Rüegg, W. (2011). A History of the University in Europe. Vol. IV: Universities Since 1945. Cambridge University Press.

Vermeulen, T., van den Akker, R. (2015). Utopia, Sort of: A Case Study in Metamodernism. Studia Neophilologica, vol. 87:sup1, p. 5–67, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00393274.2014.981964

Freinacht, H. (2017). The Listening Society. A Metamodern Guide to Politics. Book One. Metamoderna ApS.

Published

2025-05-30

How to Cite

Dzhus, V. (2025). THE EVOLUTION OF THE UNIVERSITY PHENOMENON IN THE DISCOURSE OF METAMODERNISM. Український економічний часопис, (9), 31–37. https://doi.org/10.32782/2786-8273/2025-9-5