DETERMINANTS OF AUDIT QUALITY IN UKRAINE: ANALYSIS BASED ON QUALITY CONTROL RESULTS AND MARKET INDICATORS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32782/2786-8273/2026-13-13Keywords:
audit quality, auditing, determinants of audit quality, audit market, institutional control, financial reporting, audit activityAbstract
Purpose. The purpose of the article is to investigate the determinants of audit quality in Ukraine based on a combination of theoretical approaches and empirical market data, as well as to identify key factors influencing audit quality in the context of structural transformations in the audit services market. Methods. The methodological framework is based on a combination of institutional, systemic, and analytical approaches. The study employs methods of statistical analysis, comparison, generalization, and economic interpretation of data. The empirical basis includes official reports on the audit services market, reflecting structural characteristics, pricing dynamics, and quality control results. Results. The study reveals that the audit services market in Ukraine is characterized by structural transformation, manifested in increasing service costs, market concentration, and differentiation across client segments. It is established that audit quality varies significantly depending on the category of clients, with the highest quality observed in public interest entities. The analysis confirms a relationship between audit fees and audit quality, reflecting the complexity and depth of audit procedures. A system of key determinants of audit quality is developed, including institutional, market, professional, and organizational factors. Scientific novelty. The scientific novelty lies in the integration of theoretical and empirical approaches to the assessment of audit quality, as well as in the development of a comprehensive system of determinants that reflects the multidimensional nature of audit quality within the context of a transforming market environment. Practical significance. The results of the study can be used to improve regulatory mechanisms in the audit sphere, enhance quality control systems, and support decision-making by stakeholders involved in the audit process. The proposed analytical framework can serve as a basis for further empirical and econometric research. Conclusions. Audit quality is a complex and dynamic economic category formed through the interaction of multiple factors. Its level depends on the balance between regulatory pressure, market incentives, and professional capabilities of auditors. The findings highlight the need for a comprehensive approach to audit quality assessment and provide a foundation for future quantitative research.
References
Орган суспільного нагляду за аудиторською діяльністю. Звіт про стан аудиторської діяльності в Україні за період 01 липня 2024 року – 30 червня 2025 року. Київ, 2025. URL: https://www.apob.org.ua/wp-content/uploads/2026/01/Zvit-pro-stan-rynku-2025-final.pdf
Орган суспільного нагляду за аудиторською діяльністю. Звіт з моніторингу якості ринку аудиторських послуг та конкуренції за період 01 січня 2021 року – 30 червня 2025 року. Київ, 2025. URL: https://www.apob.org.ua
Christensen B. E., Glover S. M., Omer T. C., Shelley M. K. Understanding audit quality: Insights from audit professionals and investors. Contemporary Accounting Research. 2016. Ed. 4, Vol. 33. P. 1648-1684. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1911-3846.12212
DeFond M., Zhang J. A review of archival auditing research. Journal of Accounting and Economics. 2014. Vol. 58, № 2–3. P. 275-326. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2014.09.002
Eilifsen A., Kinserdal F., Messier W. F., McKee T. E. An Exploratory Study into the Use of Audit Data Analytics on Audit Engagements. Accounting Horizons. 2020. Vol. 34, No. 4. P. 75–103. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2308/HORIZONS-19-121
International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board (IAASB). Framework for audit quality: Key elements that create an environment for audit quality. New York, 2020. URL: https://www.iaasb.org/publications/framework-audit-quality
International Federation of Accountants (IFAC). Enhancing audit quality in the public interest. New York, 2021. URL: https://www.ifac.org
Knechel W. R., Krishnan G. V., Pevzner M., Shefchik L. B., Velury U. K. Audit quality: Insights from the academic literature. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory. 2013. Vol. 32, № 1. P. 385–421. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2308/ajpt-50350
Lennox C. S., Wu X., Zhang T. Does mandatory rotation of audit partners improve audit quality? The Accounting Review. 2014. Vol. 89, № 5. P. 1775–1803. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2308/accr-50800
Tahir H., Aziz A. R. Impact of Auditor's Industry Specialization on Audit Quality: Empirical Analysis From Listed Companies From Pakistan. SSRN, 2024. 34 p. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4892781
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB). Audit quality indicators. Washington, 2020. URL: https://pcaobus.org
Sirois L.-P., Bédard J., Bera P. The Informational Value of Key Audit Matters in the Auditor's Report: Evidence from an Eye-Tracking Study. Accounting Horizons. 2018. Vol. 32, № 2. P. 141–162. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2308/acch-52047
Velte P. The impact of audit committee characteristics on audit quality: A literature review. Corporate Ownership & Control. 2020. Vol. 17, №. 2.
Patrick Velte and Jakob Issa (2019). The impact of key audit matter (KAM)
disclosure in audit reports on stakeholders’ reactions: a literature review.
Problems and Perspectives in Management, 17(3), 323-341.
doi:10.21511/ppm.17(3).2019.26
Patrick Velte and Jakob Issa (2019). The impact of key audit matter (KAM)
disclosure in audit reports on stakeholders’ reactions: a literature review.
Problems and Perspectives in Management, 17(3), 323-341.
doi:10.21511/ppm.17(3).2019.26
Patrick Velte and Jakob Issa (2019). The impact of key audit matter (KAM)
disclosure in audit reports on stakeholders’ reactions: a literature review.
Problems and Perspectives in Management, 17(3), 323-341.
doi:10.21511/ppm.17(3).2019.26
Patrick Velte and Jakob Issa (2019). The impact of key audit matter (KAM)
disclosure in audit reports on stakeholders’ reactions: a literature review.
Problems and Perspectives in Management, 17(3), 323-341.
doi:10.21511/ppm.17(3).2019.26 DOI: https://doi.org/10.21511/ppm.17(3).2019.26
World Bank. Enhancing audit quality and reporting: Policy recommendations. Washington, 2021. URL: https://www.worldbank.org
Zhao Y., Ye K. Audit quality and corporate governance: Evidence from emerging markets. Emerging Markets Review. 2023. Vol. 55.
Orhan suspilnoho nahliadu za audytorskoiu diialnistiu. (2025). Zvit pro stan audytorskoi diialnosti v Ukraini za period 01 lypnia 2024 roku – 30 chervnia 2025 roku [Report on the state of audit activity in Ukraine for the period July 1, 2024 – June 30, 2025]. Available at: https://www.apob.org.ua/wp-content/uploads/2026/01/Zvit-pro-stan-rynku-2025-final.pdf
Orhan suspilnoho nahliadu za audytorskoiu diialnistiu. (2025). Zvit z monitorynhu yakosti rynku audytorskykh posluh ta konkurentsii za period 01 sichnia 2021 roku – 30 chervnia 2025 roku [Report on monitoring the quality of the audit services market and competition for the period January 1, 2021 – June 30, 2025]. Available at: https://www.apob.org.ua
Christensen, B. E., Glover, S. M., Omer, T. C., Shelley, M. K. (2016). Understanding audit quality: Insights from audit professionals and investors. Contemporary Accounting Research, no. (4 (33)), pp. 1648-1684. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1911-3846.12212 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1911-3846.12212
DeFond, M., & Zhang, J. (2014). A review of archival auditing research. Journal of Accounting and Economics, no. (58 (2–3)), pp. 275-326. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2014.09.002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2014.09.002
Eilifsen, A., Kinserdal, F., Messier, W. F., & McKee, T. E. (2020). An Exploratory Study into the Use of Audit Data Analytics on Audit Engagements. Accounting Horizons, no. 34(4), pp. 75–103. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2308/HORIZONS-19-121 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2308/HORIZONS-19-121
International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board (IAASB). (2020). Framework for audit quality: Key elements that create an environment for audit quality. Available at: https://www.iaasb.org/publications/framework-audit-quality
International Federation of Accountants (IFAC). (2021). Enhancing audit quality in the public interest. Available at: https://www.ifac.org
Knechel, W. R., Krishnan, G. V., Pevzner, M., Shefchik, L. B., & Velury, U. K. (2013). Audit quality: Insights from the academic literature. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, no. (32(1)), pp. 385–421. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2308/ajpt-50350 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2308/ajpt-50350
Lennox, C. S., Wu, X., & Zhang, T. (2014). Does mandatory rotation of audit partners improve audit quality? The Accounting Review, no. (89(5)), pp. 1775–1803. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2308/accr-50800 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2308/accr-50800
Tahir, H., Aziz, A. R. (2024). Impact of Auditor's Industry Specialization on Audit Quality: Empirical Analysis From Listed Companies From Pakistan, SSRN. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4892781 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4892781
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB). (2020). Audit quality indicators. Available at: https://pcaobus.org
Sirois, L.-P., Bédard, J., Bera, P. (2018). The Informational Value of Key Audit Matters in the Auditor's Report: Evidence from an Eye-Tracking Study. Accounting Horizons, no. (32 (2)), pp. 141–162. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2308/acch-52047 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2308/acch-52047
Velte, P. (2020). The impact of audit committee characteristics on audit quality: A literature review. Corporate Ownership & Control, no. 17(2).
World Bank. (2021). Enhancing audit quality and reporting: Policy recommendations. Available at: https://www.worldbank.org
Zhao, Y., & Ye, K. (2023). Audit quality and corporate governance: Evidence from emerging markets. Emerging Markets Review, no. 55.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 В.М. Краєвський, Г.В. Грищук, Н.С. Дружинська

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

