MODEL ENSEMBLES IN DECISION JUSTIFICATION TASKS FOR IT PROJECT MANAGEMENT
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32782/2786-8273/2026-14-26Keywords:
digital economy, IT project, project life cycle, agile methodologies, project management, decision support, ensemble of models, boosting, neural network, risk management, performance indicatorsAbstract
Introduction. Managing IT projects requires continuous decisions whose quality determines whether a project meets its schedule, budget and client requirements. The most critical are made at the control points of the project life cycle, where the manager chooses between continuing under the current plan and initiating managerial intervention - a binary «go / no-go» choice. Their substantiation is complicated by the heterogeneity of IT projects, the limited statistics for new products, and reliance on subjective expert estimates. Under such conditions no single formal model is universally accurate. Purpose. The purpose is to develop a methodological approach to forming substantiated managerial decisions at the control points of IT projects on the basis of an ensemble of models that accounts for the specialisation of individual expert models. Methods. The study relies on ensemble machine-learning technologies. A threshold condition of committee expediency is derived analytically, showing that combining models improves the decision only when the accuracy of each expert exceeds 0.5. The core method is the authors’ algorithm of ensemble construction based on expert specialisation with dynamic integration: qualitative attributes define specialisation axes along which homogeneous subsamples are formed, and a separate radial-basis-function expert is trained on each. The decision is made by relevant experts under a stopping rule, and in case of a tie - by weighted voting according to competence coefficients. Results. The algorithm is formalised, the condition of committee expediency is proved and confirmed by a numerical counter-example, and the approach is demonstrated on an illustrative example. Because each expert specialises on a logically separated data segment, their errors are weakly correlated, providing higher efficiency than boosting on heterogeneous data. Conclusion. The proposed approach forms a decision-support tool for project offices operating under heterogeneous and limited data. Its novelty lies in transferring the expert-specialisation ensemble algorithm to binary managerial decisions at the control points of IT projects. Further research concerns approbation on real and simulated data and generalisation to a multiclass formulation.
References
Великоіваненко Г. І., Савіна С. С., Колечко Д. В., Бень В. П. Побудова ансамблів моделей кредитного скорингу. Нейро-нечіткі технології моделювання в економіці. 2018. № 7. С. 34—77. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33111/nfmte.2018.034.
Матвійчук А. В. Штучний інтелект в економіці: нейронні мережі, нечітка логіка : монографія. Київ : КНЕУ, 2011. 439 с.
Савіна С. С., Бень В. П. Об’єднання моделей logit-регресій як комітету експертів для оцінки кредитоспроможності позичальника. Нейро-нечіткі технології моделювання в економіці. 2015. № 4. С. 154—188. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33111/nfmte.2015.154.
Чорненький М. В., Скляренко О. В. Модель адаптивної трансформації бізнес-процесів у ERP-системах на основі подієво-орієнтованого підходу. Таврійський науковий вісник. Серія: Технічні науки. 2026. № 3. С. 211—220. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32782/tnv-tech.2026.3.22.
Flach P. A. Machine Learning: The Art and Science of Algorithms that Make Sense of Data. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press, 2012. 396 p. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511973000.
A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK Guide). 7th ed. Newtown Square : Project Management Institute, 2021. 370 p.
Lakhno V. A., Kasatkin D. Y., Skliarenko O. V., Kolodinska Y. O. Modeling and Optimization of Discrete Evolutionary Systems of Information Security Management in a Random Environment. Machine Learning and Autonomous Systems. Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies. Singapore : Springer, 2022. Vol. 269. P. 9—22. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-7996-4_2.
Skliarenko O., Pashko A., Lytvynenko L., Kolodinska Y. Deep learning models for solving the problem of comparing unstructured textual information. Bulletin of Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv. Physics and Mathematics. 2025. Vol. 80, No. 1. P. 157—163. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17721/1812-5409.2025/1.21.
The Standish Group. CHAOS Report. Boston : The Standish Group International, 2020.
Velykoivanenko, H. I., Savina, S. S., Kolechko, D. V., & Ben’, V. P. (2018). Pobudova ansambliv modelei kredytnoho skorynhu [Building the ensembles of credit scoring models]. Nejro-nechitki tekhnolohii modeliuvannia v ekonomitsi, 7, 34—77. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33111/nfmte.2018.034 [in Ukrainian].
Matviichuk, A. V. (2011). Shtuchnyi intelekt v ekonomitsi: nejronni merezhi, nechitka lohika [Artificial intelligence in economics: neural networks, fuzzy logic]. Kyiv: KNEU [in Ukrainian].
Savina, S. S., & Ben’, V. P. (2015). Objednannia modelej logit-rehresij yak komitetu ekspertiv dlia otsinky kredytospromozhnosti pozychalnyka [Combining logit-regression models as a committee of experts for assessing a borrower’s creditworthiness]. Nejro-nechitki tekhnolohii modeliuvannia v ekonomitsi, 4, 154—188. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33111/nfmte.2015.154 [in Ukrainian].
Chornenkyi, M. V., & Skliarenko, O. V. (2026). Model adaptyvnoi transformatsii biznes-protsesiv u ERP-systemakh na osnovi podiievo-oriientovanoho pidkhodu [A model of adaptive transformation of business processes in ERP systems based on an event-driven approach]. Tavriiskyi naukovyi visnyk. Seriia: Tekhnichni nauky, (3), 211—220. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32782/tnv-tech.2026.3.22 [in Ukrainian].
Flach, P. A. (2012). Machine Learning: The Art and Science of Algorithms that Make Sense of Data. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511973000
Project Management Institute. (2021). A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK Guide) (7th ed.). Newtown Square: PMI.
Lakhno, V. A., Kasatkin, D. Y., Skliarenko, O. V., & Kolodinska, Y. O. (2022). Modeling and Optimization of Discrete Evolutionary Systems of Information Security Management in a Random Environment. In Machine Learning and Autonomous Systems. Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies (Vol. 269, pp. 9—22). Singapore: Springer. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-7996-4_2
Skliarenko, O., Pashko, A., Lytvynenko, L., & Kolodinska, Y. (2025). Deep learning models for solving the problem of comparing unstructured textual information. Bulletin of Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv. Physics and Mathematics, 80(1), 157—163. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17721/1812-5409.2025/1.21
The Standish Group. (2020). CHAOS Report. Boston: The Standish Group International.




