PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECTS OF THE IMPACT OF PRODUCT PLACEMENT ON TARGET AUDIENCES (GENERATIONS X, Y, AND Z)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32782/2786-8273/2026-12-9Keywords:
product placement, consumer psychology, Generation X, Generation Y (Millennials), Generation Z, marketing communications, consumer behaviorAbstract
Introduction. In the context of media fragmentation, advertising saturation, and declining trust in traditional promotional messages, product placement has become an increasingly important tool of marketing communication. By integrating brands directly into media content, product placement reduces advertising avoidance and influences consumer perception through implicit psychological mechanisms. However, consumer responses to product placement vary significantly across generations due to differences in socialization, media consumption patterns, and psychological traits. Purpose. The purpose of this study is to examine the psychological aspects of product placement influence on target audiences belonging to Generations X, Y, and Z, with a focus on identifying generational differences in perception, trust, and behavioral responses. Methods. The research is based on a theoretical and comparative analysis of academic literature in marketing psychology, consumer behavior, and integrated marketing communications. Methods of logical generalization, comparative analysis, and systematization were applied to identify key psychological mechanisms of product placement influence and to compare generational characteristics of consumer perception. Results. The findings indicate that product placement affects consumers through a combination of emotional engagement, identification with characters or influencers, social imitation, and repeated exposure. Generation X demonstrates a higher level of advertising literacy and skepticism, responding positively only to logically justified and non-intrusive brand integrations. Generation Y shows stronger emotional involvement and values authenticity, storytelling, and lifestyle-oriented brand representations, which significantly influence purchase intention. Generation Z is characterized by high tolerance toward commercial content integrated into digital environments and exhibits rapid, socially driven decision-making, particularly under the influence of influencers and interactive formats. The study also identifies ethical risks associated with product placement, including manipulative influence, insufficient transparency of advertising content, and the impact on underage audiences. Conclusion. The research concludes that the effectiveness of product placement largely depends on its adaptation to generational psychological characteristics. Differentiated strategies tailored to Generations X, Y, and Z enhance marketing efficiency while reducing ethical risks. The proposed recommendations contribute to the development of responsible and psychologically informed product placement strategies in contemporary marketing practice.
References
Gupta, P. B., & Lord, K. R. (1998). Product placement in movies: The effect of prominence and mode on audience recall. Journal of Current Issues & Research in Advertising, 20(1), 47–59. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10641734.1998.10505076 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10641734.1998.10505076
Russell, C. A. (2002). Investigating the effectiveness of product placements in television shows: The role of modality and plot connection congruence on brand memory and attitude. Journal of Consumer Research, 29(3), 306–318. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/344432 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/344432
Unveiling the relation between product placement and consumer minds in the Stranger Things series. (2024). Journal of Research on Business and Tourism, 4(1), 70–81. DOI: https://doi.org/10.37535/104004120246 DOI: https://doi.org/10.37535/104004120246
Qu, Z., Yang, N., & Zhang, J. (2024). A compendium of research on the impact of product placement on consumer buying behaviour. Highlights in Business, Economics and Management, 27, 226–232. DOI: https://doi.org/10.54097/mvzmfy31 DOI: https://doi.org/10.54097/mvzmfy31
Williams, K. C., & Page, R. A. (2011). Marketing to the generations. Journal of Behavioral Studies in Business. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/242760064_Marketing_to_the_Generations
Smith, K. T. (2012). Longitudinal study of digital marketing strategies targeting millennials. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 29(2), 86–92. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/07363761211206339 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/07363761211206339
Karrh, J. A., McKee, K. B., & Pardun, C. J. (2003). Practitioners’ evolving views on product placement effectiveness. Journal of Advertising Research, 43(2), 138–149. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021849903030198 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2501/jar-43-2-138-149
Priporas, C.-V., Stylos, N., & Fotiadis, A. K. (2017). Generation Z consumers’ expectations of interactions in smart retailing. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 37, 109–120. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.01.058 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.01.058
Djafarova, E., & Bowes, T. (2021). “Instagram made me buy it”: Generation Z impulse purchases in the fashion industry. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 59, Article 102345. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2020.102345 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2020.102345
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 М.В. Когут

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

