TRENDS IN THE HARMONIZATION OF VALUE ADDED TAX WITH EU REQUIREMENTS IN GEORGIA
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33244/2617-5940.2.2022.39-65Keywords:
economic integration, legislative harmonization with the European Union, harmonization of indirect taxesAbstract
The paper refers to such a topical issue of economic integration processes as optimization of indirect taxes, consideration and convergence of the interests of taxpayers operating in different countries. The Association Agreement of Georgia with the European Union and the main reservations of the economic integration processes include the obligations of tax administration, transparency, exchange of information, cooperation in the protection of the principles of fair competition, including the sharing of experience in the fight against fraud and abuse of the value added tax (indirect taxation) system. Their implementation, first of all, involves the harmonization of Georgian legislation with EU legislation and international legal instruments. Since the signing of the Association Agreement, the provisions of indirect taxation in the Tax Code have been changed several times - the legislation has been refined and simplified. But among the taxes, the calculation of the value added tax is still the most difficult, and the main part of the losses, corruption or violations in the administration is related to this tax. Now that the European Council has recognized the perspective of Georgia's membership in the Union, in order to ensure compliance with the status, there is a motivation to assess how close the field of current VAT regulation is to best practice and to determine the possibility of diverting the identified deviations. From a pragmatic point of view, it is also important and noteworthy that the main source of revenues in the state budget of Georgia (90 %) are taxes, and among them, the value added tax has the largest specific share (40-45 %). The growth of the budget revenues to a significant extent depends on the dynamics of the growth of the country's foreign trade turnover. To the extent that Georgia is actively involved in international trade and economic relations, in order to mobilize funds in the state budget and gain competitiveness in the economy, it is necessary for taxes in the country, including VAT, to be fully harmonized with the tax regulations of EU member states. Due to the mentioned relevance and main motivations, the authors focus on the experience of value added tax regulation in EU member states and Georgia. Based on empirical data, the paper argues that the maximum harmonization of VAT in Georgia with the requirements of EU countries will increase foreign trade turnover and contribute to the increase of tax revenues in the state budget.
References
Association Agreement between Georgia on the one hand and the European Union and the European Atomic Energy Union and their member states on the other hand – 27/06/2014.
Tax Code of Georgia, consolidated version.
Order No. 326 of the Minister of Finance of Georgia, "On Administration of Taxes" on making changes to Order No. 996 of the Minister of Finance of Georgia
dated December 31, 2010; St. Tbilisi; December 30, 2020.
Paola Conconi; Carlo Perroni; Raymond Riezman; Is partial tax harmonization desirable? Journal of Public Economics, Volume 92, Issues 1–2, February 2008, Pages 254–267.
Steffen Osterloh Friedrich Heinemann; The political economy of corporate tax harmonization – Why do European politicians (dis)like minimum tax rates? European Journal of Political Economy, Volume 29, March 2013, Pages 18–37.
Ourania Karakosta, Christos Kotsogiannis, Miguel-Angel Lopez-Garcia; Indirect tax harmonization and global public goods; International Tax and Public Finance 21, 29–49 (2014).
Kristian Behrens, Jonathan H. Hamilton, Gianmarco I.P. Ottaviano, Jacques-FrançoisThisse; Commodity tax harmonization and the location of industry; Journal of International Economics, Volume 72, Issue 2, July 2007, Pages 271–291.
Кадомцева С. В., Золотарева Ю. О. Налоговая гармонизация в условиях развития международных экономических объединений. Научные исследования экономического факультета. Электронный журнал. 2017. Том 9, выпуск 3. С. 28–45.
Christos Kotsogiannis, Miguel-AngelLopez-Garcia, Gareth D.Myles, The origin principle, tax harmonization and public goods; Economics Letters Volume 87, Issue 2, May 2005, Pages 211–219.
Vander Lucas, Tax harmonisation and the origin principle; Economics Letters, Volume 71, Issue 1, April 2001, Pages 111–115.
Christos Kotsogiannis, Miguel-Angel Lopez-Garcia; On commodity tax harmonization and public goods provision; Pacific Economic Review, Volume 23, Issue 6 December 2021; Pages 1220–1227.
Krasnov, A.; Okanova, A.; Yeraliyeva, Y.; Kozhakhmetova, M.; Karshalova, A.; Aitkazina, M. 2020. Development of the financial policy of the Eurasian economic union countries: tax harmonization. Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues 8(1): 138–149.
Chi-Chur Chao, Eden S. H. Yu; Environmental Impacts of Tariff and Tax Reforms Under Origin and Destination Principles; Pacific Economic Review, Volume 20, Issue 2; Special Issue: Taxation and Macroeconomics, May 2015, Pages 310–322.
Assaf Razin Efraim Sadka, International tax competition and gains from tax harmonization, Economics Letters, Volume 37, Issue 1, September 1991, Pages 69–76.
Gebhard Kirchgässner, Werner W. Pommerehne; Tax harmonization and tax competition in the European Union: Lessons from Switzerland; Journal of Public Economics; Volume 60, Issue 3, June 1996, Pages 351–371.
Юренев Ю. Обзор налогов в Европе: сравнительная таблица главных налогов для физических и юридических лиц. URL: https://prian.ru/pub/obzor-nalogov-v-evrope-sravnitelnaya-tablica-glavnyhnalogov-dlya-fizicheskih-i-yuridicheskih-lic.html
Ministry of Economy and Sustainable Development of Georgia. URL: http://www.economy.ge/?page=ecopolitic&s=12
Akhalaia, N., Jalagonia, D., Liparteliani, N.; Teaching Some Issues of Problem Solving and Decision Making in the Social Science; 2012 4th International Conference "Problems of Cybernetics and Informatics", PCI 2012 – Proceedings, 2012, 6486483. URL: https://www.scopus.com/authid/detail.uri?authorId=55646561300
John R. McGowan; B. Anthony Billings; An analysis of the European community VAT: Implications for U.S. tax policy; ournal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, Volume 6, Issue 2, 1997, Pages 131–148.
G. Bedianashvili, Yu. B. Ivanov, T. V. Paientko. Tax Reforms in Ukraine and Georgia. Journal of Tax Reform. 2019. 5(2). Р. 107–128.
Michael Keen; Sajal Lahiri; Pascalis Raimondos-Møller; Tax principles and tax harmonization under imperfect competition: A cautionary example; European Economic Review; Volume 46, Issue 8, September 2002. Pages 1559–1568.
Yoshiaki Ohsawa. A spatial tax harmonization model; European Economic Review; Volume 47, Issue 3, June 2003, Pages 443–459.
Pavel Semerád; Lucie Bartůňková. VAT Control Statement as a Solution to Tax Evasion in the Czech Republic; 19th International Conference Enterprise and Competitive Environment 2016, ECE 2016, 10–11, March 2016, Brno, Czech Republic; Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences 220 (2016). Р. 417–423.
Tomasz Strąka, Michał Tuszyńsk. Quantitative analysis of a private tax rulings corpus; 24th International Conference on Knowledge-Based and Intelligent Information & Engineering Systems; Procedia Computer Science 176 (2020) 2445–2455.
Amita Majumder; Ranjan Ray; Sattwik Santra; Should commodity tax rates be uniform across regions in a heterogeneous country? Evidence from India; Journal of Policy Modeling; Volume 43, Issue 6, November–December 2021, Pages 1310–1331.
