QUALITY CONTROL OF AUDIT SERVICES IN THE CONTEXT OF BUSINESS DIGITAL TRANSFORMATION

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32782/2786-8273/2025-11-13

Keywords:

audit, quality control, digital transformation, digital technologies, artificial intelligence, blockchain, quality management, big data

Abstract

Introduction. The article examines modern approaches to audit quality control in the context of business digital transformation. It explores the challenges caused by the automation of financial processes, the use of big data analytics, artificial intelligence, blockchain technologies, and cloud platforms. Particular attention is paid to the need to adapt traditional quality control methods and enhance auditors’ digital competencies to ensure reliability, transparency, and efficiency in audit procedures. The purpose of the study is to assess the impact of digitalization on audit processes and to develop recommendations for the implementation of effective quality management systems in Ukrainian audit firms. Methods. To achieve this goal, the study applies a systematic analysis of scientific sources and regulatory frameworks, a comparative method for evaluating international and national practices, as well as logical, critical, and empirical methods to determine the influence of digital technologies on audit quality. Results. The research focuses on international quality management standards ISQM 1, ISQM 2, and the revised ISA 220, which introduce a risk-based approach and emphasize continuous monitoring and improvement of audit procedures. It also analyzes the role of digital instruments — big data analytics, robotic process automation (RPA), artificial intelligence and machine learning (AI/ML), process mining, blockchain, and cloud solutions — in enhancing audit efficiency, transparency, and assurance reliability. The results confirm the necessity of integrating digital technologies into the audit quality control system and strengthening professional competencies of auditors. The article proposes developing a roadmap for implementing quality management systems, defining audit quality indicators (AQIs), and establishing procedures for identifying and addressing root causes of deviations. Conclusion. The practical implementation of these measures will improve audit effectiveness, increase trust in financial reporting, and contribute to the formation of a sustainable audit quality system in the digital era.

References

Deloitte. Audit Quality Transparency Report. – Deloitte Global, 2022.

International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board (IAASB). International Standard on Auditing 220 (Revised): Quality Management for an Audit of Financial Statements. IFAC, 2020.

International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board (IAASB). International Standard on Quality Management 1 (ISQM 1): Quality Management for Firms that Perform Audits or Reviews of Financial Statements, or Other Assurance or Related Services Engagements. IFAC, 2020.

International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board (IAASB). International Standard on Quality Management 2 (ISQM 2): Engagement Quality Reviews. IFAC, 2020.

KPMG. The Future of Audit: Perspectives in a Digital World. – KPMG International, 2021.

Nezhyva, M., Miniailo, V. Digitalization of Audit in the Conditions of the COVID-19. Herald of Kyiv National University of Trade and Economics, 2020. № 3, pp. 123–134.

Федерація професійних бухгалтерів і аудиторів України (ФПБАУ). Матеріали та методичні рекомендації щодо впровадження систем управління якістю відповідно до ISQM. Київ, 2022.

Кононенко Л., Гай О. Використання сучасних цифрових технологій в аудиті: проблеми та перспективи. Економічний простір. 2023.

Мороз Ю. Ю., Гайдучок Т. С. Цифрова трансформація аудиторського бізнесу: нові горизонти та перспективи. Цифрова економіка та економічна безпека.2023. № 5 (05). С. 109-114.

Салямон-Міхєєва К. Д. Особливості аудиту в умовах воєнного стану. Державне управління: удосконалення та розвиток, 2025. № 4, С. 15–22.

Deloitte. (2022). Audit quality transparency report. Deloitte Global.

International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board (IAASB). (2020). International Standard on Auditing 220 (Revised): Quality management for an audit of financial statements. IFAC.

International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board (IAASB). (2020). International Standard on Quality Management 1 (ISQM 1): Quality management for firms that perform audits or reviews of financial statements, or other assurance or related services engagements. IFAC.

International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board (IAASB). (2020). International Standard on Quality Management 2 (ISQM 2): Engagement quality reviews. IFAC.

KPMG. (2021). The future of audit: Perspectives in a digital world. KPMG International.

Nezhyva, M., & Miniailo, V. (2020). Digitalization of audit in the conditions of the COVID-19. Herald of Kyiv National University of Trade and Economics, no. 3, pp. 123–134.

Federation of Professional Accountants and Auditors of Ukraine (FPBAU). (2022). Materials and methodological recommendations for the implementation of quality management systems in accordance with ISQM. Kyiv.

Kononenko, L., & Hai, O. (2023). Use of modern digital technologies in auditing: Problems and prospects. Ekonomichnyi Prostir.

Moroz, Y. Y., & Haiduchok, T. S. (2023). Digital transformation of the auditing business: New horizons and prospects. Digital Economy and Economic Security, no. 5 (05), pp. 109-114.

Saliamon-Mikheieva, K. D. (2025). Features of auditing under martial law. Public Administration: Improvement and Development, no. 4, pp. 15–22.

Published

2025-12-21

How to Cite

Saliamon-Mikhieieva, K., & Kraievskyi, V. (2025). QUALITY CONTROL OF AUDIT SERVICES IN THE CONTEXT OF BUSINESS DIGITAL TRANSFORMATION. Український економічний часопис, (11), 89–93. https://doi.org/10.32782/2786-8273/2025-11-13

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >>